Contact us

Get Started

Case Study

plans

From agency fees to AI efficiency: Two shops, one Cloudginny playbook

We replaced an €800/month agency fee with €159 software, rebuilt tracking from the ground up and simplified campaigns around intent. Daily AI-guided micro-optimizations shifted budget toward profitable queries. Result: ROI positive from day one, +63% CTR, and 155 hours less operational work within two months.

When we took over Google Ads for two very different shops, bergbaukalender.de (a seasonal niche product) and GERMENS.shop (art-fashion with drop cycles), two issues blocked progress: high fixed agency fees and unreliable measurement. We started where most “quick fixes” skip: measurement. That meant clean events, unambiguous conversions per shop, deduped signals, and an attribution setup that makes decisions defensible.

With the foundation in place, we simplified the account structure. Brand, generic and long-tail were separated by intent. Match types were used deliberately. Negatives were maintained as a living policy. Ad assets were aligned to the query’s promise, not to internal naming. In parallel, we flipped the cost equation: from €800/month in fees to €159 in software. Lower fixed costs are not a vanity win. They create test bandwidth and testing is the engine.

From there, progress came from disciplined small steps at a high cadence. AI-guided micro-optimizations reallocated spend to winners, dialed down underperformers, mined long-tail queries, expanded negatives and rotated assets. None of this is magic. It’s boring, repeatable process and it only works when measurement can be trusted.

Within two months, both shops saved 155 hours of busywork and avoided €850 in wasted ad spend. Fixed costs dropped by €641/month. The +63% CTR lift isn’t the trophy. It’s a symptom of better query-ad-landing alignment. We also separate tactics from context: the calendar business has seasonality. The fashion brand peaks around drops. That’s why we benchmark gains against explicit periods, keep attribution consistent and watch impression mix so brand inflation doesn’t flatter the numbers.

What’s left? Turn on Target ROAS where data density supports it, not everywhere by default. Treat negative keywords as an ongoing loss-prevention policy. And be explicit about method: time windows, attribution, data hygiene. Strong claims like “ROI from day one” deserve clear assumptions and a screenshot trail.

Playbook

  • Fix measurement: single-source conversions, dedupe, consistent attribution window.
  • Simplify accounts: separate by intent (brand/generic/long-tail), maintain negatives continuously.
  • Optimize daily: budget shifts, query mining, asset rotation, pause losers quickly.
  • Change the cost base: swap €800/month fees for €159/month software, reinvest into tests.
  • Scale deliberately: Target ROAS where data supports it, remarketing for drops, deepen long-tail.

Results

Metric
Before
After
Fixed costs / month
€800
€159
CTR
Baseline
+63%
Ops time saved
-
155 hrs / 2 mo
Ad spend avoided
-
€850
Measurement note: GA4 data-driven attribution, 56 days before vs 56 days after, seasonality for the calendar business reviewed separately.
germens_startpage_screen_en

plans

Get Started

FAQs

plans

Do you have questions?


How did ROI turn positive on day one?

What does “AI-guided” actually do?

How do you control for seasonality?

What does this cost?